Visual Biases Near the Hands Help Us Perform Specific Actions

Summary: According to a new study, our visual systems prioritize information relevant to actions we are about to take.

Source: APS.

Using your hands to perform tasks in specific ways can change the way you see things near your hands, according to new research published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. The research shows that learning to grasp an object with the backs of the hands made participants more sensitive to motion near their hands, while learning a to pick up an object with their fingertips enhanced participants’ perception of spatial detail near their hands.

“These results support the idea that vision is, in a sense, tuned for action,” says psychological scientist Laura Thomas of North Dakota State University, author of the study. “This evidence suggests that people experience flexible visual biases when viewing information within reach that may aid the actions they are prepared to take.”

Previous studies have indicated that our visual biases – the visual information we’re attuned to at a given time – may adapt to the immediate context. When participants in one study adopted a power-grasp posture, they showed greater sensitivity to motion-related information that would allow them to make a quick and forceful grab. When the participants adopted a precision-grasp posture, they were more sensitive to detailed spatial information that would help them manipulate something small.

These findings suggest that the visual system prioritizes processing information that is relevant to the actions we are likely to take, allowing us to be more effective power or precision graspers, depending on the situation.

Thomas wondered whether a short-term training experience might be sufficient to induce these action-oriented visual biases. To find out, she conducted two experiments in which participants learned to use their hands in new ways to pick up objects.

In the first experiment, 60 student participants completed two visual perception tasks, as their hands either rested on the display or in their laps. In one task, they saw a group of moving dots—some of which moved in the same direction—and had to indicate the direction in which the dots appeared to be moving. In the other task, they saw another group of stationary dots—some of which were arranged in a particular spatial pattern—and had to say whether the dots appeared in a radial or concentric spatial pattern.

The participants then practiced a new type of power grasp, using the backs of their hands to pick up and move a plunger.

After this training, the participants completed the two visual perception tasks again.

In the second experiment, another group of 60 student participants followed the same procedure – this time, they learned a new type of precision grasp, using the tips of their little fingers to pick up and move one bean.

The results of the two experiments showed that potential action seemed to drive the way the participants processed visual information, but only when that information was near their hands.

Participants were better at identifying the direction in which the dots were shifting after learning the back-of-the-hands power grasp, but only when their hands were near the display.

And they were more accurate in identifying the spatial pattern of dots after learning the finger-tips precision grasp – again, only when their hands were near the display.

Image shows people sitting around a table.
When the participants adopted a precision-grasp posture, they were more sensitive to detailed spatial information that would help them manipulate something small. NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the APS press release.

Together, these findings suggest that our visual system flexibly adapts to recent experiences, allowing us to take action in effective and appropriate ways.

Thomas is planning further research to examine this phenomenon, investigating whether the kinds of visual biases she has observed in lab-based tasks also emerge when people look at and interact with everyday objects.

“The more we learn about how visual processing biases near the hands operate, the more potential we have to make recommendations about how to best present information on handheld devices, like smartphones and tablets, to meet users’ information processing goals,” she says.

About this neuroscience research article

Funding: This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant BCS 1556336 and by a Google Faculty Research Award.

Source: Laura E. Thomas – APS
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the APS press release.
Original Research: Abstract for “Action Experience Drives Visual-Processing Biases Near the Hands” by Laura E. Thomas in Psychological Science. Published online November 21 2016 doi:10.1177/0956797616678189

Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article

[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]APS “Visual Biases Near the Hands Help Us Perform Specific Actions.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 5 December 2016.
<https://neurosciencenews.com/hands-action-visual-biases-5683/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]APS (2016, December 5). Visual Biases Near the Hands Help Us Perform Specific Actions. NeuroscienceNew. Retrieved December 5, 2016 from https://neurosciencenews.com/hands-action-visual-biases-5683/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]APS “Visual Biases Near the Hands Help Us Perform Specific Actions.” https://neurosciencenews.com/hands-action-visual-biases-5683/ (accessed December 5, 2016).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]


Abstract

Action Experience Drives Visual-Processing Biases Near the Hands

Observers experience affordance-specific biases in visual processing for objects within the hands’ grasping space, but the mechanism that tunes visual cognition to facilitate action remains unknown. I investigated the hypothesis that altered vision near the hands is a result of experience-driven plasticity. Participants performed motion-detection and form-perception tasks—while their hands were either near the display, in atypical grasping postures, or positioned in their laps—both before and after learning novel grasp affordances. Participants showed enhanced temporal sensitivity for stimuli viewed near the backs of the hands after training to execute a power grasp using the backs of their hands (Experiment 1), but showed enhanced spatial sensitivity for stimuli viewed near the tips of their little fingers after training to use their little fingers to execute a precision grasp (Experiment 2). These results show that visual biases near the hands are plastic, facilitating processing of information relevant to learned grasp affordances.

“Action Experience Drives Visual-Processing Biases Near the Hands” by Laura E. Thomas in Psychological Science. Published online November 21 2016 doi:10.1177/0956797616678189

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.
Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.