A password will be e-mailed to you.

Ill Gotten Gains Are Worth Less in the Brain

Summary: According to a new study, the brain responds less to rewards gained from immoral acts than it does to ethically earned rewards.

Source: UCL.

The brain responds less to money gained from immoral actions than money earned decently, reveals a new UCL-led study.

The research, published in Nature Neuroscience and funded by Wellcome, helps explain why most people are reluctant to seek illicit gains by identifying a neural process that dampens the appeal of profiting at other people’s expense.

“When we make decisions, a network of brain regions calculates how valuable our options are,” explained lead author Dr Molly Crockett of the University of Oxford, who carried out the research while based at the UCL Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging. “Ill-gotten gains evoke weaker responses in this network, which may explain why most people would rather not profit from harming others. Our results suggest the money just isn’t as appealing.”

The research team scanned volunteers’ brains as they decided whether to anonymously inflict pain on themselves or strangers in exchange for money. The study builds on previous research by the same team that showed people dislike harming others more than harming themselves. This behaviour was seen again in this study, with most people more willing to harm themselves than others for profit.

The study involved 28 pairs of participants who were anonymously paired and randomly assigned to be either the ‘decider’ or the ‘receiver’. Deciders picked between different amounts of money for different numbers of electric shocks. Half the decisions related to shocks for themselves and half to shocks for the receiver, but in all cases the deciders would get the money. The shocks were matched to each recipient’s pain threshold to be mildly painful but tolerable. The deciders were in an fMRI brain scanner.

As they made their decisions, a brain network including the striatum was activated, as it has been shown in previous studies to be key to value computation. As they decided between more profitable options or those with fewer shocks, this brain network signalled how beneficial each option was. The network responded less to money gained from shocking others, compared with money gained from shocking oneself – but only in those people who behaved morally.

Image shows the location of the prefrontal cortex in the brain.

The lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC), a brain region involved in making moral judgments, was most active in trials where inflicting pain yielded minimal profit. NeuroscienceNews.com image is for illustrative purposes only.

Meanwhile, the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC), a brain region involved in making moral judgments, was most active in trials where inflicting pain yielded minimal profit. In a follow-up study, participants made moral judgements about decisions to harm others for profit, and considered those same trials to be the most blameworthy. Taken together, the findings suggest the LPFC was assessing blame. When people refused to profit from harming others, this region was communicating with the striatum, suggesting that neural representations of moral rules might disrupt the value of ill-gotten gains encoded in the striatum.

“Our findings suggest the brain internalizes the moral judgments of others, simulating how much others might blame us for potential wrongdoing, even when we know our actions are anonymous,” Dr Crockett said.

Senior author Professor Ray Dolan (UCL Max Planck Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research) said: “What we have shown here is how values that guide our decisions respond flexibly to moral consequences. An important goal for future research is understanding when and how this circuitry is disturbed in contexts such as antisocial behaviour.”

About this neuroscience research article

Funding: Funding provided by Wellcome.

Source: Chris Lane – UCL
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the UCL news release.
Original Research: Abstract for “Moral transgressions corrupt neural representations of value” by Molly J Crockett, Jenifer Z Siegel, Zeb Kurth-Nelson, Peter Dayan & Raymond J Dolan in Nature Neuroscience. Published online May 1 2017 doi:10.1038/nn.4557

Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
UCL “Ill Gotten Gains Are Worth Less in the Brain.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 1 May 2017.
<http://neurosciencenews.com/ethics-neuroscience-lpfc-6549/>.
UCL (2017, May 1). Ill Gotten Gains Are Worth Less in the Brain. NeuroscienceNew. Retrieved May 1, 2017 from http://neurosciencenews.com/ethics-neuroscience-lpfc-6549/
UCL “Ill Gotten Gains Are Worth Less in the Brain.” http://neurosciencenews.com/ethics-neuroscience-lpfc-6549/ (accessed May 1, 2017).

Abstract

Moral transgressions corrupt neural representations of value

Moral systems universally prohibit harming others for personal gain. However, we know little about how such principles guide moral behavior. Using a task that assesses the financial cost participants ascribe to harming others versus themselves, we probed the relationship between moral behavior and neural representations of profit and pain. Most participants displayed moral preferences, placing a higher cost on harming others than themselves. Moral preferences correlated with neural responses to profit, where participants with stronger moral preferences had lower dorsal striatal responses to profit gained from harming others. Lateral prefrontal cortex encoded profit gained from harming others, but not self, and tracked the blameworthiness of harmful choices. Moral decisions also modulated functional connectivity between lateral prefrontal cortex and the profit-sensitive region of dorsal striatum. The findings suggest moral behavior in our task is linked to a neural devaluation of reward realized by a prefrontal modulation of striatal value representations.

“Moral transgressions corrupt neural representations of value” by Molly J Crockett, Jenifer Z Siegel, Zeb Kurth-Nelson, Peter Dayan & Raymond J Dolan in Nature Neuroscience. Published online May 1 2017 doi:10.1038/nn.4557

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.
Join our Newsletter
Sign up to receive the latest neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email daily from NeuroscienceNews.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.
No more articles