Summary: A new study reports on the role dopamine plays in decision making.
Source: UT San Antonio.
How do we know if it was worth the wait in line to get a meal at the new restaurant in town? To do this our brain must be able to signal how good the meal tastes and associate this feeling with the restaurant. This is done by a small group of cells deep in the brain that release the chemical dopamine. The amount of dopamine released by these cells can influence our decisions by telling us how good a reward will be in the future. For example, more dopamine is released to the smell of a cake baking relative to the smell of leftovers. But does waiting change how dopamine is released?
A new study in Cell Reports by Matthew Wanat, assistant professor of biology at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), sheds light on how dopamine cells in the brain signal the passage of time. Wanat’s study used a technique called voltammetry to record dopamine release in rodents trained using Pavlovian conditioning. This task used two different tones that both predicted the delivery of a food reward. One tone was presented only after a short wait while the other tone was presented only after a long wait. Wanat and colleagues found that more dopamine was released to the short wait tone. These results highlight that when dopamine neurons respond to cues, faster is better.
“The big question that we’re focusing on is to identify the brain signals that influence the decisions we make,” Wanat said. “Many decisions are based upon comparing the value between cues associated with different rewards. There is a lot of evidence to suggest that these dopamine signals and external cues provide useful value-related signals that could inform our decisions to engage in a behavior.”
While Wanat and his collaborators are interested in studying how dopamine release is involved with cues triggering behavior, their work could also inform the understanding of drug addiction, which is closely intertwined with dopamine. Drug addiction can “hijack” the brain regions where dopamine is released. “By figuring out how the dopamine system works in normal and abnormal circumstances, we could potentially identify important changes and the ways that could target the dopamine system to rectify the consequences of those behaviors,” Wanat said.
“A lot has been said about the role of dopamine in reward, but reward is only really important in the context of making choices. Dr. Wanat’s experiments allow direct measurement of dopamine acting in the brain during the process of choosing, and reveals how the brain decides the values of our choices,” said Charles Wilson, Ewing Halsell Distinguished Chair in Biology.
Wanat’s overarching research focuses on the brain’s relationships with memory, stress and drug addiction and how those components interact with each other. He is a member of the UTSA Neurosciences Institute, a multidisciplinary research organization for integrated brain studies with the mission to foster a collaborative community of scientists committed to studying the biological basis of human experience and behavior and the origin and treatment of nervous system diseases.
Wanat is one of 40 brain health researchers at UTSA, a group that includes experts in neurodegenerative disease, brain circuits and electrical signaling, traumatic brain injury, regenerative medicine, stem cell therapies, medicinal chemistry, neuroinflammation, drug design and psychology. Together, they are collaborating on complex, large-scale research producing a greater understanding of the brain’s complexity and the factors that cause its decline.
Source: Joanna Carver – UT San Antonio
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com images is in the public domain.
Original Research: Full open access research for “Dopamine Encodes Retrospective Temporal Information in a Context-Independent Manner” by Kaitlyn M. Fonzi, Merridee J. Lefner, Paul E.M. Phillips, and Matthew J. Wanat in Cell Reports. Published online August 22 2017 doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.076
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]UT San Antonio “How Dopamine Tells Us Something Isn’t Worth the Wait.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 16 October 2017.
<https://neurosciencenews.com/dopmaine-decision-making-7741/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]UT San Antonio (2017, October 16). How Dopamine Tells Us Something Isn’t Worth the Wait. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved October 16, 2017 from https://neurosciencenews.com/dopmaine-decision-making-7741/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]UT San Antonio “How Dopamine Tells Us Something Isn’t Worth the Wait.” https://neurosciencenews.com/dopmaine-decision-making-7741/ (accessed October 16, 2017).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
Abstract
Dopamine Encodes Retrospective Temporal Information in a Context-Independent Manner
Highlights
•Cue-evoked dopamine release encodes retrospective temporal information
•Dopamine signals differences between cues in a context-independent manner
•Conditioned responding is not related to a difference in dopamine release between cues
•Conditioned responding relates to a change in dopamine release to a given cue
Summary
The dopamine system responds to reward-predictive cues to reflect a prospective estimation of reward value, although its role in encoding retrospective reward-related information is unclear. We report that cue-evoked dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core encodes the time elapsed since the previous reward or rather the wait time. Specifically, a cue that always follows the preceding reward with a short wait time elicits a greater dopamine response relative to a distinct cue that always follows the preceding reward with a long wait time. Differences in the dopamine response between short wait and long wait cues were evident even when these cues were never experienced together within the same context. Conditioned responding updated accordingly with a change in cue-evoked dopamine release but was unrelated to a difference in the dopamine response between cues. Collectively, these findings illustrate that the cue-evoked dopamine response conveys a subjective estimation of the relative reward rate.
“Dopamine Encodes Retrospective Temporal Information in a Context-Independent Manner” by Kaitlyn M. Fonzi, Merridee J. Lefner, Paul E.M. Phillips, and Matthew J. Wanat in Cell Reports. Published online August 22 2017 doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.076
