Summary: A new study published in Nature sheds light on how populations of neurons work together during working memory and decision making tasks. Researchers report individual neurons are briefly active, but populations of neurons working together carry information for longer periods of time by being active at different times.
Results suggest cooperation between neurons allows choice-relevant information to persist over time.
By training mice to perform a sound identification task in a virtual reality maze, researchers at Harvard Medical School and the Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT) have identified striking contrasts in how groups of neurons in different cortex regions of the brain function during decision making.
The findings, published in Nature on July 19, shed light on potential neural mechanisms involved in working memory and decision making.
“Our study is a step toward thinking of the brain not in terms of the activity of individual neurons, but rather what is special about neurons when they work together,” said co-senior study author Christopher Harvey, assistant professor of neurobiology at HMS. “Revealing how populations of neurons work and what emergent properties might arise helps us better understand the mechanisms that underlie complex brain functions.”
To investigate how populations of neurons work together in different regions of the brain, Harvey and his colleagues — including lead study author Caroline Runyan, postdoctoral fellow in neurobiology at HMS, and Eugenio Piasini and Stefano Panzeri of the IIT — trained mice to perform a simple task in a virtual reality environment.
Running on a spherical ball that floats on a cushion of air, the mice navigated through a T-shaped maze that was projected on a screen in front of them. They were presented with a sound, and had to report whether that sound originated from their left or right side by turning in that direction at the T-intersection.
As the mice performed this task, the team recorded the activity of groups of neurons, roughly 50 at a time, from the auditory cortex–which processes sound stimuli — and the posterior parietal cortex–which receives information from the auditory cortex and other sensory regions, and is associated with more complex cognitive functions.
Using newly developed computational techniques that allowed them to analyze the simultaneous influence that each neuron had on the activity of its neighbors, the team found that populations of neurons in the auditory cortex tended to work independently of each other, with each neuron having little influence on others. In contrast, populations of neurons in the posterior parietal cortex greatly influenced one another, and appeared to work cooperatively.
The activity of individual neurons is brief, but populations of neurons working together can carry information for longer periods by being active at different time points. In the posterior parietal cortex, the strong cooperative activity allowed groups of neurons to carry information about the sound identification task for up to a second. Groups of neurons in the auditory cortex carried information for only a few hundred milliseconds.
“The transient activation of neurons in the auditory cortex is great for representing sound, which fluctuates rapidly,” Harvey said. “But we think that parietal cortex neurons work together on the longer timescale that we observed because they need to integrate information over time to make the best possible choice.”
In support of this hypothesis, the team found mice were more likely to make the correct choice while navigating the maze in trials where parietal cortex neurons seemed to be working better as a group, with stronger coupling in the activity of neurons. In trials with weaker coupling, mice seemed more likely to make an incorrect choice.
While the activity of individual neurons has been studied for decades, recent advances in technology have allowed neuroscientists to begin to investigate large groups of neurons simultaneously. The results of this study, Harvey said, are important for deciphering how populations of neurons interact with one another and revealing emergent properties such as varying timescales of activity, which informs the study of higher cognitive functions.
“Our hope is if we can understand the network and synaptic mechanisms responsible for the differences between the parietal and auditory cortices, it might lead to insight on the mechanisms that underlie short-term, or working, memory,” Harvey said. “I think the more we start to develop tools and ways to think about populations of neurons, the more we are going to be able to understand about the brain.”
Funding: The study was supported by a Burroughs-Wellcome Fund Career Award at the Scientific Interface, the Searle Scholars Program, the New York Stem Cell Foundation, the Armenise-Harvard Foundation, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, a Brain & Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Young Investigator Award, the National Institutes of Health (grants R01-MH107620 and R01-NS089521), the Autonomous Province of Trento (Grandi Progetti ATTEND) and the Fondation Bertarelli.
Source: Kevin Jiang – Harvard
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is credited to Harvey Lab/HMS.
Original Research: Abstract for “Distinct timescales of population coding across cortex” by Caroline A. Runyan, Eugenio Piasini, Stefano Panzeri & Christopher D. Harvey in Nature. Published online July 19 2017 doi:10.1038/nature23020
Distinct timescales of population coding across cortex
The cortex represents information across widely varying timescales. For instance, sensory cortex encodes stimuli that fluctuate over few tens of milliseconds, whereas in association cortex behavioural choices can require the maintenance of information over seconds. However, it remains poorly understood whether diverse timescales result mostly from features intrinsic to individual neurons or from neuronal population activity. This question remains unanswered, because the timescales of coding in populations of neurons have not been studied extensively, and population codes have not been compared systematically across cortical regions. Here we show that population codes can be essential to achieve long coding timescales. Furthermore, we find that the properties of population codes differ between sensory and association cortices. We compared coding for sensory stimuli and behavioural choices in auditory cortex and posterior parietal cortex as mice performed a sound localization task. Auditory stimulus information was stronger in auditory cortex than in posterior parietal cortex, and both regions contained choice information. Although auditory cortex and posterior parietal cortex coded information by tiling in time neurons that were transiently informative for approximately 200 milliseconds, the areas had major differences in functional coupling between neurons, measured as activity correlations that could not be explained by task events. Coupling among posterior parietal cortex neurons was strong and extended over long time lags, whereas coupling among auditory cortex neurons was weak and short-lived. Stronger coupling in posterior parietal cortex led to a population code with long timescales and a representation of choice that remained consistent for approximately 1 second. In contrast, auditory cortex had a code with rapid fluctuations in stimulus and choice information over hundreds of milliseconds. Our results reveal that population codes differ across cortex and that coupling is a variable property of cortical populations that affects the timescale of information coding and the accuracy of behaviour.
“Distinct timescales of population coding across cortex” by Caroline A. Runyan, Eugenio Piasini, Stefano Panzeri & Christopher D. Harvey in Nature. Published online July 19 2017 doi:10.1038/nature23020