A password will be e-mailed to you.

Regional Differences Among Chandelier Cells

Summary: Location is important when it comes to neural gene expression and connections, a new study reports.

Source: Max Planck Florida.

The brain is composed of distinct regions that differ in their functional roles and cellular architecture. For example, the hippocampus is an area well-known for its involvement in memory and its dysfunction in diseases such as Alzheimer’s, while the neocortex is involved in functions such as perception, consciousness, and language. The hippocampus has a single, curved cell layer, while the neocortex has six, stacked layers. At the cellular level, although they share canonical types of inhibitory interneurons (INs) and excitatory principal neurons (PNs), it remains largely unknown to what extent a single type in different brain regions displays similarity in gene expression, axonal shape, connectivity, and developmental origins.

To approach this problem, researchers in the laboratory of Hiroki Taniguchi, Ph.D., Research Group Leader at the Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience (MPFI), took advantage of a unique class of INs called chandelier cells. As their name suggests, these neurons have a distinctive, chandelier-like shape. Most importantly, when their axonal processes stretch out and connect to neighboring cells, they almost always do so at the same location on that neuron – the axon initial segment – and nowhere else. These powerful inhibitory connections control the output of hundreds of neighboring excitatory PNs. These stereotypical features and the fact that chandelier cells are present in both the hippocampus and the neocortex make them an ideal model to study regional differences in a single canonical neuronal type.

To visualize different cell types in the brain, researchers often need genetic access to that cell – the ability to express a gene of interest only in, say, chandelier cells, but not neighboring neurons. Years ago, Taniguchi developed a method for studying chandelier cells in the neocortex, but access to those in the hippocampus has remained elusive. Two postdoctoral researchers in Taniguchi’s lab, Yugo Ishino, Ph.D. and Michael Yetman, Ph.D., followed in his footsteps, painstakingly screening molecules until they found one that was reliably expressed in hippocampal chandelier cells – cadherin 6. Luckily, a mouse model already existed that allowed the team to take advantage of this gene expression and use it to compare the two cell populations.

Now with the ability to compare these two populations, the team found that chandelier cells in the hippocampus expand twice the size of axonal arbors in the neocortex and made twice as many connections as their counterparts. Additionally, the hippocampal chandelier cells were born several days earlier during embryonic development than the neocortical ones. Lastly, the team identified a gene, calretinin, in the hippocampal cells which was not expressed in the neocortical cells – suggesting the possibility that these cells exhibit different functional properties as well.

The scientists wondered what factors determined regional differences in these cells’ characteristics. Were the traits predetermined by genes that were set at the start of the cell’s life? Or did the environment in which they ‘grew up’ have a stronger influence?

Image shows chandelier cells.

A-D, Upper panels show confocal projection images indicating the extent of axonal arbors in RFP(+) hippocampal chandelier cells (h-ChCs) (A, C) and RFP(+) neocortical chandelier cells (nc-ChCs) (B, D). The A-P (A, B) and M-L (C, D) extent of ChC axonal arbors in sagittal and coronal sections, respectively, are shown. Asterisks indicate both ends of axonal arbors. Confocal single optical sections in lower right panels represent enlarged images of boxed areas in upper panels showing axonal varicosities (magenta) aligned along the axon initial segments (green) stained with anti-Ankyrin G antibodies. Lower left panels show individual cartridge structures. E, F, 3-D reconstructions of an h-ChC (E) and an nc-ChC (F) in sagittal sections. Axonal processes are color-coded according to their depth. NeuroscienceNews.com image is credited to Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience.

To answer this question of nature versus nurture, the researchers took cells that would grow to become chandelier cells in the hippocampus and transplanted them into the neocortex, and took cells that would grow to become neocortical chandelier cells and transplanted them to the hippocampus. Each ended up taking on the characteristics of its new neighbors, implying that the environment that they grew up in strongly influenced the fate of these cells.

These results, Taniguchi explained, show that exquisite modifications of canonical neuronal types in different brain regions may contribute to their functional diversification. Future studies should elucidate the molecular and cellular mechanisms by which regional environment controls phenotypic variations of neuronal types.

With the novel genetic access to hippocampal chandelier cells developed in the Taniguchi Lab at MPFI, neuroscientists can begin asking questions about the function of these cells within learning and memory circuits. The ability to manipulate specific genes within these hippocampal chandelier cells may allow for more meticulous studies of several diseases, including epilepsy and schizophrenia, in which these neurons have been implicated.

About this neuroscience research article

Funding: Funding provided by Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy (CURE), Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience and Max Planck Society.

Source: Jennifer Gutierrez – Max Planck Florida
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is credited to Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience.
Original Research: Abstract for “Regional Cellular Environment Shapes Phenotypic Variations of Hippocampal and Neocortical Chandelier Cells” by Yugo Ishino, Michael J. Yetman, Serena M. Sossi, André Steinecke, Yasufumi Hayano and Hiroki Taniguchi in Journal of Neuroscience. Published online September 14 2017 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0047-17.2017

Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
Max Planck Florida “Regional Differences Among Chandelier Cells.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 10 October 2017.
<http://neurosciencenews.com/chandelier-cell-differences-7719/>.
Max Planck Florida (2017, October 10). Regional Differences Among Chandelier Cells. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://neurosciencenews.com/chandelier-cell-differences-7719/
Max Planck Florida “Regional Differences Among Chandelier Cells.” http://neurosciencenews.com/chandelier-cell-differences-7719/ (accessed October 10, 2017).

Abstract

Regional Cellular Environment Shapes Phenotypic Variations of Hippocampal and Neocortical Chandelier Cells

Different cortical regions processing distinct information, such as the hippocampus and the neocortex, share common cellular components and circuit motifs but form unique networks by modifying these cardinal units. Cortical circuits include diverse types of GABAergic interneurons (INs) that shape activity of excitatory principal neurons (PNs). Canonical IN types conserved across distinct cortical regions have been defined by their morphological, electrophysiological, and neurochemical properties. However, it remains largely unknown whether canonical IN types undergo specific modifications in distinct cortical regions and display “regional variants”. It is also poorly understood whether such phenotypic variations are shaped by early specification or regional cellular environment. The chandelier cell (ChC) is a highly stereotyped IN type, which innervates axon initial segments of PNs, and thus serves as a good model to address this issue. Here we show that Cadherin-6 (Cdh6), a homophilic cell adhesion molecule, is a reliable marker of ChCs and Cdh6-CreER mice (both sexes) provide genetic access to hippocampal ChCs (h-ChCs). We demonstrate that compared to neocortical ChCs (nc-ChCs), h-ChCs cover twice as much area and innervate twice as many PNs. Interestingly, a subclass of h-ChCs exhibits calretinin (CR) expression, which is not found in nc-ChCs. Furthermore, we find that h-ChCs appear to be born earlier than nc-ChCs. Surprisingly, despite the difference in temporal origins, ChCs display host region-dependent axonal/synaptic organization and CR expression when heterotopically transplanted. These results suggest that local cellular environment plays a critical role in shaping terminal phenotypes of regional IN variants in the hippocampus and the neocortex.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Canonical IN types conserved across distinct cortical regions such as the hippocampus and the neocortex are defined by morphology, physiology, and gene expression. However, it remains unknown whether they display phenotypic variations in different cortical regions. In addition, it is unclear whether terminal phenotypes of regional IN variants belonging to a canonical IN type are determined intrinsically or extrinsically. Our results provide evidence of striking differences in axonal/synaptic organization and CR expression between h-ChCs and nc-ChCs. They also reveal that local cellular environment in distinct cortical regions regulates these terminal phenotypes. Thus, our study suggests that local cortical environment shapes the phenotypes of regional IN variants, which may be required for unique circuit operations in distinct cortical regions.

“Regional Cellular Environment Shapes Phenotypic Variations of Hippocampal and Neocortical Chandelier Cells” by Yugo Ishino, Michael J. Yetman, Serena M. Sossi, André Steinecke, Yasufumi Hayano and Hiroki Taniguchi in Journal of Neuroscience. Published online September 14 2017 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0047-17.2017

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.
Join our Newsletter
Sign up to receive the latest neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email daily from NeuroscienceNews.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.
No more articles